I am trying to clear up a question I have been asked:
If you have undertaken study and examination in a given area and have an official document to prove this, which you then used to obtain a licence for this area. If in a few years time you do not pay the licence fee and let your licence lapse is it correct to say that you are "qualified but unlicensed"?
Qualified but unlicensed?
-
tanger32au
- Senior Member
- Posts: 181
- Joined: Tue Apr 19, 2011 12:01 pm
- Contact:
-
Vkfour
- Senior Member
- Posts: 376
- Joined: Tue Oct 05, 2010 11:27 am
Re: Qualified but unlicensed?
Maybe so. Amateurs can allow their licence to lapse and then apply for a new on on production of their certificate of proficiency. However, there's nothing to say that the regulatory authority hasn't changed the requirements in the meantime, and your old qualifications don't pass muster anymore.