//Rant On
This is the sort of BS I hate to see, two organisations within close proximity using frequencies pairs that double up with each other. While I can pick them apart with CTCSS it's one of those annoying things I hate to deal with, and while they are all "sub local" in vicinity surely they could of assigned them some other frequencies to use.
We are talking a difference of 10 odd km's between them...
Now this could just very well be Crosscom being a clumsy accredited frequency registrant (I suspect they are registered with ACMA).
L = Local Business/Organisation
X = Crosscom
L - http://web.acma.gov.au/pls/radcom/licen ... _NO=384416
X - http://web.acma.gov.au/pls/radcom/licen ... NO=1329023
L - http://web.acma.gov.au/pls/radcom/licen ... _NO=319990
X - http://web.acma.gov.au/pls/radcom/licen ... NO=1329022
L - http://web.acma.gov.au/pls/radcom/licen ... _NO=190156
X - http://web.acma.gov.au/pls/radcom/licen ... NO=1329020
L - http://web.acma.gov.au/pls/radcom/licen ... _NO=384416
X - http://web.acma.gov.au/pls/radcom/licen ... NO=1329023
//Rant Off
Matching freq's in close proximity
- Stretch
- Forum Manager
- Posts: 3528
- Joined: Thu Aug 09, 2007 8:29 pm
- Location: Gold Coast
- Contact:
Re: Matching freq's in close proximity
Our local channel 8 repeater had to be taken down due to an almost matching freq closeby.
Causing interferance.
Causing interferance.
Mitch Rogers